Dawn of a Virtual Classless Society?

One definition of the proletariat is the class of people that have only their labor to support them, i.e. don’t own the “means of production”, classical factors of production including instruments of labor and subjects of labor. I would assert that we have entered an era where a large segment of production centered around information has made this concept obsolete. The means of production (or MoP) of a software based product today is free, at least from the perspective of a developer with an idea and the skills and desire necessary to implement it. The tools required to develop quality software can be accessed or downloaded with zero monetary investment. This includes development of enterprise scale applications. There are no licensing or maintenance costs associated development using the JDK, and like it or not, Java/EJB has a commanding lead in the enterprise marketplace over it’s closest competitor, Microsoft’s .NET. Serious relational databases now exist in the open-source world – MySQL and PostgreSQL for example. World class IDEs exist for Java development that may be used and extended, free of charge. The documentation needed to learn to develop software with these tools is freely available on the Internet. Access to the Internet is free at most public libraries as well as the coffee shop down the street.

According to the MoP article on Wikipedia as it existed on 20100107, when the workers control the MoP directly, it embodies the pure ideal of socialism:

“In the pure ideal of socialism, such as that ‘communism’ was/is supposed to be, the MoP are controlled by the workers production collectives directly. In fact this situation has only been historically realized temporarily such as in the Israeli kibbutz or the early Soviets before the entrenchment of the communist party as a ‘New Class’, or in isolated or preliminary form such as in the final phase of the Second Spanish Republic, or various experimental utopian communities.”

If this is the case, it may well be that the open-source community accomplished what the Soviet Union could not. Perhaps such a “utopian community” now exists in cyberspace. When it comes to information based products, and we live in an information age, the MoP now rests in the hands of the workers. Development environments, libraries, frameworks, source control systems, collaboration tools, issue/defect management systems – are are freely available under license agreements no more restrictive than the GPL or BSD licenses. Anyone with sufficient will and vision can produce and market a product to the entire planet. Some may argue that it takes considerably more, and this kind of opportunity is only available to members of the Bourgeoisie, since there’s no way to gain the knowledge and skills necessary to bend the available tools and infrastructure to your ends without considerable investment of capital in the first place. That’s not my experience, and I’m more than willing to debate the issue. Any resourceful “potential programmer” can find all they need at their fingertips – including tutorials and a strong support community. All that’s really needed is a recognized need and the willingness to pursue it’s solution.

Thinking about thinking

I watched Jill Bolte Taylor’s talk on the rolls of the hemispheres of the brain yesterday on TED, and it has me thinking more about Zen and Kabalah. Both of these disciplines enjoin the practitioner to learn to control the mind for a metaphysical end, and one of the meditation techniques described as “quieting the mind” sounds very similar to the experience Dr. Taylor describes in her talk about her stroke. The idea that we can move out of the ego based context of the left brain into the right brain’s experience of the universal whole by our own volition is captivating and exciting. To me, this seems like a neurological holy grail on the path to gnosis or bodhi.  Having experienced a glimps of this state as a youth, I can understand how people through the ages would dedicate years of hard work to cultivate this ability.  Dr. Taylor’s work reinforces much of what I intuitively feel about the nature of my internal dialog and it’s relationship to me and the world around me.  It’s easy to conclude that this voice is the self, but the transendental experienceso eloquently described by Dr. Taylor shatters that illusion.  The ego is not the self, and allowing the dialog to go silent is not the end of the world.  Rather, it is a means to get in touch with our true selves and experience the peace of knowing that we’re a part of something bigger that the ego can comprehend.